One of
the persistent attacks against Islam is that it is a religion which stifles the
social involvement of women. By social involvement, we mean involvement in those
spheres of endeavor which occur outside of the home and impact on the general
nature and direction of society. Islam, it is said, desires to divest women of
any meaningful social role, to keep them “trapped” in the confines of their
homes, under the constant surveillance and control of men. This claim, as we
will endeavor to show, does not accurately reflect the fullness of Islamic
teachings on this issue.
While
Islam does advocate a social scheme which places great emphasis on the domestic
role of women, it also creates ample space for their meaningful participation in
public affairs. The purpose of this article is to examine aspects of that
social involvement based on the Qur’an and the prophetic tradition. That
examination will be preceded by a brief expose on the fundamental equality of
men and women in Islam.
The Fundamental Equality
of Men and Women in Islam
The
Qur’an emphasizes that men and women are equal in their essential physical and metaphysical nature. We read in that regard, “We have surely ennobled
the descendants of Adam.”
[1]
This ennoblement of the human being precludes any claims to gender superiority,
or any feelings of inferiority based on physical, or metaphysical composition.
Such feelings underlie schemes of gender-based oppression, and have no place in
Islam.
We also
read in the Qur’an, “We have surely created the human in the best of molds.”
[2]
Again, this process of human creation is not gender specific. It includes men
and women. As human beings, they have both been created in the best of molds,
and their respective ability to fulfill their human potential hinges on factors
which have nothing to do with their physical differences.
Islam
also emphasizes that both men and women are equal in their servitude to God.
Neither gender is a greater or lesser servant of the Divine, even though that
servitude may vary in some minor details. For example, women are ordered to
cover their hair, while husbands are ordered to spend for their wives’ maintenance. In the modern human-centric worldview, both of these orders would
be considered manifestations of oppression; of women in the first instance, of
men in the second. However, as Muslims we understand that these are simply two varying
manifestations of servitude. We further understand that “God does not desire to oppress His servants in
any way.”
[3]
Furthermore,
men and women are rewarded equally for their righteous deeds. God says in the
Qur’an, “And your Lord replied, ‘I shall never cause the deeds of any of you
to be lost, male or female, you are of each other.”
[4]
This verse, and those immediately following it, advocate that women and men are
equal in their religion, human worth, the rewards they receive for their
worship, and the recompense for their worldly struggles. Imam Fakhr ad-Din ar-Razi
summarizes these meanings in his commentary on these verses:
There is no difference in
God’s response [to their supplications], nor in the recompense received by the
male and the female [for their righteous deeds], as long as they are equal in steadfastly
maintaining the obedience of God. This indicates that virtue in religion is
based on deeds and not accidental attributes. The fact that some people are
male or female, or from lowly or lofty lineage has no bearing in this area.
[5]
A related verse mentions
that this fundamental equality also pertains in terms of their susceptibility
to the punishment of God as a consequence of transgression. God says, “Whoever
does wrong will be recompensed accordingly. And whoever does good, male or
female, as long as they are believers, they will enter Gardens, provided for
therein without stint.”
[6]
Even if
one believed that men are “better” than women, that belief has no meaning in
practical terms, as a particular woman can be better than a particular man, based
on her deeds and actions. Similarly, the generality of women can be better than
the generality of men in a
particular time and place. The great grammarian, Ibn Hisham al-Ansari,
elucidates this point in his explanation of the use of the definite article in
the Arabic language. He says:
The definite article is
for demarcating a category. Hence, your saying, “The man is better than the
woman,” if you do not mean by that statement a particular man or a particular
woman. Rather, what you mean is that the [former] category in and of itself is
better [than the latter]. It is not correct to say that every single man is
better than every single woman, because reality contradicts that.
[7]
Hence, there is no basis
in Islam, if it is properly understood, for any woman to believe that she is
inferior to any man. The deeds of the individual are what distinguishes him or
her. One whose deeds are best, be he male or female, is best. As God proclaims, “The most noble of you with God is the most pious.”
[8]
The Social Involvement
of Women
God says in the Qur’an, “Those who when we give them authority on earth, establish regular prayers,
pay the poor due, command good, and forbid wrong. And unto God is the end of
all affairs.”
[9]
This verse presents four pillars of an Islamic social order, specifically:
- Establishing regular
prayer.
- Paying the poor due.
- Commanding the good.
- Forbidding the wrong.
In a functional Islamic
society women share all of these duties with men. This is made clear from the
following verse in the Qur’an:
“The believing men
and women are supportive and protective friends unto each other. They enjoin
the right, forbid the wrong, establish regular prayer, pay the poor due, and
are dutifully obedient to God and His Messenger. They will receive the Mercy of
God. Surely, God is Almighty, Wise.”
[10]
In this
verse, the four duties mentioned above are restated, and then mentioned as
being undertaken by both men and women. The socio-political implications of
this verse are made clear to us if we consider that the relationship it
articulates between men and women is one of tremendous relevance in the greater
societal sphere. This relationship is described by the Arabic term “Wilaya.” This term is defined by al-Fayruzabadi in al-Qumus, one of the most authoritative Arabic
dictionaries, as involving, “Planning, governance, and authority.”
[11]
In all of these duties, men and women support and strengthen each other, as Ibn
Kathir, among others, makes clear in his commentary on this verse.
[12]
The result of such a healthy relationship between the sexes would be a strong,
balanced, just, and pious society.
The
political implications of commanding the good and forbidding the wrong are
further clarified by the wording of the Second Oath of ‘Aqaba, which is
referred to as the Oath of War, because of its clear political implications. This
oath is distinguished from the First Oath of ‘Aqaba, which focused on issues
related to personal piety and individual conduct, and was known as the Oath of
the Women.
[13]
The former
oath, as related by Ibn Hisham, reads as follows:
The Prophet, Peace and
Blessings of God upon him, spoke. He recited the Qur’an, invited [people] to
God, encouraged them to accept Islam, and then said: “I take the oath from you
that you protect me as you protect your women and children.” Al-Bara’ b. Ma’rur
took his [blessed] hand and said, “Yes, O Messenger of God! We will protect you
as we protect our womenfolk and our very souls! We take the oath from you O
Messenger of God! We are a warrior people, armed with weapons we have inherited
over long generations.
[14]
In
addition to the men taking this oath, which clearly delineates socio-political
duties and obligations, it was also entered into by two women, Umm ‘Umarah
Nusayba bint Ka’b, and Umm Muni’ Asma’ bint ‘Amr, and accepted from them by the
Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him.
[15]
This is a clear proof that both men and women are equal partners in the Islamic
social project. From this general description of the social involvement of
women in a Islamic society, we wish to move to specific examples.
Women Fighting to
Protect Islam
During the
Battle of Uhud, Umm ‘Umara Nusayba bint K’ab, one of the women present at the
Second Oath of ‘Aqaba, valiantly defended the Messenger of God, sustaining
twelve wounds in the process. She nearly killed Ibn Qami’a, one of the fiercest
warriors in the opposing force. After the fray, the Prophet, Peace and
Blessings of God be upon him, praised her courage and skill.
[16]
This affirmation from the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him,
prevents anyone from denying the permissibility of women fighting under similar
circumstances, even if other prophetic traditions argue against such fighting
being obligatory for them.
[17]
The
Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him, also gave tidings to Umm Haram
bint Mulham that she would fight in a naval battle. This came after she sought
his permission to go forth in a military campaign. She subsequently married
Ubada b. as-Samit, and participated with him in a naval expedition.
[18]
The fact that her participation in that battle occurred with the foreknowledge
and permission of the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him, is again
a powerful argument against those who would refuse to acknowledge the permissibility
of this and far lesser significant types social involvement.
It is a
well-known principle in the Divine Law that in the face of a direct invasion of
a Muslim land by non-Muslim forces, it is mandatory for every able-bodied woman
to join the Muslim defenses to repulse the aggressor.
[19]
As a general practice, the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him,
would bring women along on military campaigns to function as nurses and to
undertake other support and logistical roles.
[20]
‘Aisha, Umm Sulaym, Umm Salit, and many others distinguished themselves performing
such duties.
Direct Participation of
Women in the Political Process
If we can
generally define the political process of a particular society as the method by
which publicly binding decisions are made, then it is clear that women were an
integral part of the political process in the polity presided over by the
Prophet Muhammad, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him. An example of this
would be the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him, accepting the
advise of his wife, Umm Salama, to go out and sacrifice his animal then shave
his head during the crisis which occurred at al-Hudaybiyya. All of the
companions, dissatisfied with the conditions of the treaty that had been struck
between the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God upon him, and his enemies,
refused his order to end their lesser pilgrimage. However, when they saw the
Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him, undertake the rites of release
they quickly followed suit. Hence, it was the counsel of a woman which ended
one of the greatest political crisis yet to occur in the nascent Islamic state.
[21]
A similar
example can be taken from an incident which occurred during the conquest of
Makka. Umm Hani’ bint Abi Talib, the sister of Imam ‘Ali, granted an oath of
protection to two idolaters who had actually fought the advancing Muslim
forces. When she informed the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him,
of that, he responded, “We give our collective oath of protection to anyone you
have pledged to protect, Umm Hani’.”
[22]
This act of Umm Hani’ was a state-level political edict which was affirmed by
the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him. These and many other
examples clearly indicate that the social involvement of women in Islam reaches
the highest levels of public affairs
The
social involvement of Muslim women is further illustrated by the controversial
issue of ‘Aisha leading a military campaign to seek retribution for the murder
of ‘Uthman ibn ‘Affan, the third leader of the Muslim community after the
passing of the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God be upon him. ‘Aisha did not
enjoy universal support in the endeavor. Among those refusing to endorse
‘Aisha’s mission was Abu Bakra.
[23]
He based his refusal on a tradition he had heard from the Prophet, Peace and
Blessings of God be upon him, mentioning that a people who depute their affair
to a woman will never succeed. That tradition reads as follows:
In the days prior to the
Battle of the Camel, God benefited me from a prophetic tradition I [recalled]
hearing from the Prophet, Peace and Blessings of God upon him.
[24]
When it reached the Prophet that the Persians had elevated the daughter of
Kisra to the throne, he said, “A people who depute their affair to a woman will
never succeed.”
[25]
Hence, Abu Bakra
deduced that ‘Aisha’s effort was futile. However, this conclusion was not
shared by other companions, many of them more learned than Abu Bakra. ‘Aisha, a
great jurist in her own right, agreed to lead the expedition. Talha and
al-Zubayr, two of the ten specifically promised Paradise, supported her
decision. Hence, from this earliest time, there was a difference of opinion as
to the scope and parameters of a woman’s leadership.
This
difference of opinion occurring amongst the Companions, concerning the extent
of a woman’s political authority continued among latter jurists. While they
agreed on the prohibition of a woman ascending to the highest office in the
Islamic state, the Caliphate, they differed concerning other high level
positions. For example, Imam al-Tabari and Ibn Hazm considered it permissible
for women to serve as judges, unconditionally. Imam Abu Hanifa viewed it
permissible for a woman to serve as a judge in those issues where her witness
is accepted. Others viewed it as being impermissible for a woman to serve in
the judiciary under any circumstances.
[26]
We should
note that the interpretation of the Prophet’s, Peace and Blessings of God be
upon him, words concerning the outcome of a woman’s leadership, may involve
intangibles which we are incapable of comprehending. In that context, they
might not be the expression of a binding historical law. Were they the expression
of such a law, they would seemingly be contradicted by events which occurred both
before and after its utterance.
As for
pre-Islamic times, the Qur’an itself relates the story of Bilqis, the legendary
Queen of Sheba. She is mentioned in the Qur’an as attaining worldly success,
[27]
and as eventually accepting Islam. Ibn Kathir mentions that she commanded a
council of 312 delegates, each of whom represented 10,000 men.
[28]
She was a very successful leader, and her people prospered under her reign.
After the
time of the Prophet, Peace and Blessing of God be upon him, there are similar
instances of successful woman leaders. Both in general, and in specific
military campaigns, of the type undertaken by ‘Aisha. In this latter category,
we could mention the British rout of the Argentines during the 1982 Falklands
War. That victory occurred at a time when England was under the leadership of
two women, Queen Elizabeth II, and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
These two
examples in no way contradict the statement of the Prophet, Peace and Blessings
of God be upon him, “A people who depute their affairs to a woman will never
succeed,” if we accept that the tradition in question has an interpretation
beyond our superficial understanding. Surely, God knows best.
In
conclusion, Islam is for all people, all times, and all places. It is flexible
enough to accommodate many different types of societies, and societal
arrangements. It advocates a balanced social order where men and women occupy
largely complimentary roles. Although these roles are not always “equal” as we
have come to use that term in the context of contemporary analyses of gender
relations, they have enough flexibility to accommodate the dignified social
involvement of women. The examples used in our brief analysis could have been
expanded to include areas such as seeking knowledge, teaching, commerce, business,
professions, and other realms. However, what we have mentioned should suffice
to show that claims which posit that Islam denies women a space for meaningful
social involvement are both misleading and inaccurate.
Imam Zaid Shakir
Hayward, CA
04.01.04
[5]
Fakhr ad-Din
ar-Razi, at-Tafsir al-Kabir, (Beirut:
Dar Ihya at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1417/1997), vol. 3, p. 470.
[7]
Ibn Hisham
al-Ansari, Qatr an-Nada wa Ball as-Sada,
ed. Muyiddin ‘Abdul Hamid (Sayda, Lebanon: al-Maktaba al-‘Asriyya, 1421/2000),
p. 135.
[11]
Tahir Ahmad
az-Zawi, Tartib al-Qamus
al-Muhit, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, n.d.),
vol.4, p. 658.
[12]
See, for
example Ibn Kathir, Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Adhim, (Sayda, Lebanon: Al-Maktaba al-‘Asriyya, 1421/2000) vol. 2, p. 336.
[13]
For an
English language account of these two oaths in see Martin Lings, Muhammad:
His Life Based on the Earliest Sources,
(Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society, 1997), pp. 108-112.
[14]
Ibn Hisham
al-Mu’afiri, As-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah,
(Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1410/1994), vol. 2, p. 75.
[15]
Ibn Hisham
al-Mu’afiri, vol. 2, p. 74.
[16]
For one of the
earliest accounts of the heroics of Umm ‘Umarah during the Battle of Uhud, see
Muhammad b. Sa’d az-Zuhri, At-Tabaqat al-Kubra, (Beirut: Dar Ihya at-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1417/1996), vol. 8, pp.
440-441, #4535.
[17]
This would
include those traditions that mention the best Jihad for women is the
Pilgrimage. See for example, Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, Fath al-Bari Sharh
Sahih al-Bukhari, (Riyadh: Maktaba Dar
as-Salam, 1418/1997),vol. 6, p. 96, #2875, 2876.
[18]
For an
account of her story, see Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, vol. 6, pp. 94-95,
#2877-2878.
[19]
Muhammad
Khayr Haykal, Al-Jihad wa’l Qital fi as-Siyasa ash-Shar’iyya, (Beirut: Dar al-Bawadir, 1317/1996), vol. 2, pp.
880-881.
[20]
See Ibn
Hajar al-‘Asqalani, vol. 6, p. 96, #2880.
[21]
For an
English language account of this incident, see Lings, pp. 254-255.
[22]
For a
narration of this incident, see Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, vol. 6, p. 328; #3171.
[23]
Abu
Bakra’s full name is Nufay’ b.
Ma’ruq. He should not be confused with Abu Bakr as-Siddiq.
[24]
The Battle
of the Camel, 35AH/656AD, involved the forces of Imam ‘Ali and the hosts
supporting ‘Aisha. Imam ‘Ali’s forces achieved a quick and decisive victory.
For an account of the events leading up to that conflict, see Marshal Hodgson, The
Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1974),
vol. 1, pp. 212-215.
[25]
Ibn Hajar
al-‘Asqalani, vol. 13, p. 67; #7099.
[26]
Wahbah
Az-Zuhayli, Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu,
(Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1418/1997), vol. 8, pp.6238-6239.
[27]
In the
Qur’an 27:23 she is mentioned as having been given, “An abundance of all
things.” Ibn Kathir, qualifies
this as meaning that she was given everything needed by a successful,
well-established king. See Ibn Kathir, vol 3, p. 338.
[28]
Ibn Kathir,
vol. 3, p. 338.
|